Skip to content
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Philosophia Verlag GmbH

Home arrow Philosophia Contributions to Philosophy arrow Scherzer, Johann Adam _From Handbook of Mereology
Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. If you want to put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.


 


Hans Burkhardt and Stamatios Gerogiorgakis

Scherzer, Johann Adam _From Handbook of Mereology


ISBN: 978-3-88405-663-9

Price: €9.80 (including 19 % tax)


Johann Adam Scherzer (1628-1683) taught philosophy in Leipzig. Of historical importance to mereology is the chapter of his Axiomata resoluta on the subject (Scherzer 1686). This work influenced his pupil Leibniz who treated Scherzer along with Joachim Jungius as sources of his mereological analyses in a number of texts. Scherzer’s mereology chapter is an introduction to the part-whole relation for undergraduates. The author treats the part-whole relation as one of the three basic ontological relations – together with substanceaccident and cause-effect. The text bears resemblance to the obligationes, introductions to modal theory written for students by the postmedieval scholastic logicians and philosophers. Scherzer’s approach to mereological structures is typical for his time and also for similar medieval and postmedieval texts. Mereological discussions of this kind are not to be found for centuries to follow. Mereological structures were, at any rate, not explicitly discussed in later textbooks. Scherzer discusses different kinds of wholes, ontological structures and the difference between the ontological and the epistemic approach. He formulates eleven rules: I. The simple is prior by nature to the composite whose part it is. The simple is not always temporally prior to the whole because sometimes the simple and the composite emerge simultaneously. E.g. when God created prime matter he added form to it at the same moment. (Prime matter is traditionally seen as ens rationis or more exactly as ens rationis cum fundamento in re.) The simple is prior by nature necessarily. Scherzer points out that in the following conditional the consequent does not follow from the antecedent: “There is a part, therefore there is a whole” whereas the following conditional is always true: “There is a whole, therefore there is a part”



 





new publications

Cosmetics and Makeup
Cosmetics and Makeup
€9.80
Add to Cart

The Virtue Analysis of Inner Beauty: Inner Beauty as Moral, Eudaimonistic, or Relational Virtueness
The Virtue Analysis of Inner Beauty: Inner Beauty as Moral, Eudaimonistic, or Relational Virtueness
€14.80
Add to Cart

The Beauty of Landscape
The Beauty of Landscape
€9.80
Add to Cart

Aesthetic Experience and the Experience of Poetry
Aesthetic Experience and the Experience of Poetry
€14.80
Add to Cart

An Aesthetics of Insight
An Aesthetics of Insight
€14.80
Add to Cart

The Case Against Beauty
The Case Against Beauty
€14.80
Add to Cart

The Beauty of Doing: Remarks on the Appreciation of Conceptual Art
The Beauty of Doing: Remarks on the Appreciation of Conceptual Art
€14.80
Add to Cart

The Value of Art: On Meaning and Aesthetic Experience in Difficult Modern Art
The Value of  Art: On Meaning and Aesthetic Experience in Difficult Modern Art
€9.80
Add to Cart

Art, Beauty, and Criticism
Art, Beauty, and Criticism
€9.80
Add to Cart

Beauty and Bell’s Aesthetic Emotion
Beauty and Bell’s Aesthetic Emotion
€14.80
Add to Cart